🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.